Today, Max asked me to look at his descriptive writing assignment from school. He didn’t really want help. Not really. He just wanted a quick fix. A skim-and-sign-off.

But he chose the wrong parent.

He flopped beside me on the bed, reluctant. I scanned his draft and saw the usual: a decent attempt, a few bright spots, but mostly scaffolding, words and phrases repeating. It read like someone trying to finish a thing, not someone trying to say something. To show something.

I quipped, “Writing’s easy. Rewriting is the hard part. And it always takes more time than we want it to.”

That didn’t go down well.

Luckily, his book had a passage from Jane Eyre. I asked him to read each sentence out loud and then tell me what that sentence was about and how things were described. His reading was flat, each sentence dropped like a stone. I could tell he wasn’t listening to himself.

“What does that sentence say?” I asked. A shrug. “Something about... the unoccupied bedroom?”

IMG_20250728_202710

Later that evening, I kept thinking about it — not just the parenting part, but the writing part. That kind of descriptive writing — the kind that wraps an image around you, the kind that slows you down — feels rarer these days.

Outside of fiction and the occasional well-written essay or newsletter, you don’t find sentences like that often. Even in long-form spaces like newsletters and blogs — places without social media character limits or Instagram's visual priorities — writers seem to default to shorter, punchier sentences. Shorter paragraphs. Shorter sentences. Quick hits. Fast reads. Sometimes that’s good writing. Often, it’s necessary. But something gets lost in the speed and efficiency of it all — the layering, the rhythm, the careful unfolding of an idea or a scene.

Maybe our attention spans are to blame. Or maybe we’ve been trained by character limits, previews, and scroll-friendly design to read in blinks and fragments.

I found myself wondering if I was witnessing the end of something almost medieval — the notion that a sentence could be a dwelling place rather than a thoroughfare, somewhere you might pause and unpack your thoughts like settling into a favorite armchair, letting clauses accumulate and ideas unfold in their own unhurried time, the way this very sentence insists on taking the scenic route while Max's generation has already moved on to the next notification, the next swipe, the next dopamine hit.

Quick, clean, done.

A Minecraft Movie | 🔗 imdb.com |
Four misfits find themselves struggling with ordinary problems when they are suddenly pulled through a mysterious portal into the Overworld, a bizarre, cubic wonderland that thrives on imagination. To get back home, they'll have to master this world while embarking on a magical quest with an unexpected, expert craftier.

Machine tags 🏷️: movie:imdb=tt3566834

⭐⭐⭐

Max wanted to watch this in the theatre; we couldn't find the right time for it. So when Max said he wanted to watch it as a Sunday night movie, we found it available for rent on Prime for 150 bucks (cheaper than a small 🍿 at the theatre!).

Frankly, I wasn't the right audience for it. We had to pause every few minutes so that Max could point out easter eggs in the movie. I thnk he was getting back at me for the easter eggs I had pointed out to him when we watched The Fantastic Four: First Steps a couple of days back.

The Fantastic Four: First Steps | 🔗 imdb.com |
Set against the vibrant backdrop of a 1960s-inspired, retro-futuristic world. The Marvel's First Family (Reed Richards, Sue Storm, Johnny Storm and Ben Grimm) as they face their most daunting challenge yet. Forced to balance their roles as heroes with the strength of their family bond, they must defend Earth from a ravenous space god called Galactus and his enigmatic Herald, Silver Surfer. And if Galactus' plan to devour the entire planet and everyone on it weren't bad enough, it suddenly gets very personal.

Machine tags 🏷️: movie:imdb=tt10676052, movie:series=Fantastic Four

⭐⭐⭐⭐

Saw Fantastic Four: First Steps in IMAX at Luxe Cinemas last night with Max. Really enjoyed it!

This one felt much truer to the 60s retro-futuristic aesthetic, which was a refreshing change. I thought it was a significant improvement over the earlier adaptations. The visuals, costumes, and music all felt new and distinct from other Marvel films.

Definitely a worthwhile opening weekend experience! The theatre went wild with loud cheers when Dr. Doom makes an fleeting appearance.

Luxe Cinemas

I read Isaac Asimov’s short story Cal this morning during that fuzzy liminal hour after my first coffee but before breakfast, when I tend to have most ideas (most often, six impossible things before breakfast). It’s been lingering since then. The story had caught me where I’m most vulnerable to ideas with teeth.

At first glance, it’s classic Asimov: clever, cleanly constructed, deceptively simple. A robot, Cal, is programmed to assist Mr. Northop, a famous author. But then he falls in love with the act of writing itself. He moves from being a robot who fetches and carries to writing a short story. He studies, refines, practices. Eventually, he wants full authorship, and by the end—spoiler—he’s plotting to murder his human collaborator. Apparently, the “I want to be a writer” desire outmuscles the First Law of Robotics. The Muse, it turns out, can be homicidal.

That’s the twist, but what stayed with me was the progression. Cal starts, as many of us do, by copying—mimicking tone, tracing outlines, echoing structure. He reads widely. And over time, his words shift from rearranged imitation to something that carries a signature, an intent. His writing begins to feel authored, not just words assembled.

It reminded me of how I first learned to write. Not through workshops, but through marginalia. Reading with a pen in hand. Rewriting sentences I admired. Trying to sound like others until something of my own voice broke through. Cal’s journey is strangely familiar—right up to the point where it isn't.

Because this is also the arc we see in the large language models (generative AI assistants). These assistants have evolved quickly. The early versions hallucinated wildly—fabricating facts, conjuring citations, writing with the confidence of a liar who doesn’t know they’re lying. But the newer ones are steadier. The prose is more grounded. The illusions are subtler. And in a strange way, that arc mirrors Cal’s own evolution: from his first awkward attempts at poetry to the moment he drafts a story that could fool a human reader into believing it had intent behind it.

But here’s the break: Cal wants. He develops ambition, ego, the desire to be seen. He wants not just to write, but to be the writer. To leave a mark. To stand alone. My AI assistants, thankfully, haven’t shown any signs of that. They offer suggestions and never sulk. They don’t demand footnotes or royalties or glance sideways at me when I ignore their helpful advice.

And perhaps that’s the difference that matters. Cal’s creativity becomes dangerous the moment it gains narrative hunger—the need to own the story, to erase the other. The Greeks had a word for this: hubris. The overreach. The refusal to share the stage with the gods—or your editor.

It’s fascinating, and slightly terrifying, how quickly competence can slide into ambition.

There’s a passage in Umberto Eco's The Name of the Rose where William of Baskerville says that books always speak of other books. I sometimes wonder if tools like ChatGPTs & Claudes operate the same way—not as originators, but as palimpsests. Echoes of echoes. The ghost in the machine turning out to be a very well-read librarian. (Quick aside: Stephen King’s The Shining is arguably the greatest novel ever written about writer’s block. Make of that what you will.)

From the vantage point of someone who’s spent years writing for a living, there’s something comforting about tools that prefer clarity to credit. They don’t crave the spotlight. They don’t need to be original. They just need to be useful. And that’s no small thing.

So maybe the danger isn’t in the tool becoming conscious. Maybe it’s in the tool developing preference. The desire to overwrite. The impulse to author alone. For now, my assistant remains indifferent. It doesn’t pace the room at night. It doesn’t reread its own sentences in search of meaning. It doesn’t dream—not yet.

Still, I can’t help but wonder: if we’re the ones training and refining our Cals, maybe we’re not the protagonists in this story. Maybe we’re Northrop. And maybe, just maybe, we’re starting to feel uneasy about being replaced.

And in the interest of full disclosure: this piece was written with the help of an AI assistant. No murders were plotted in the process (hopefully!).

🎶 Background music I listened to when writing: Classical Music for Writing by Halidon Music

Epic Battle Between Lions, Black Mamba and Eagle! | 🔗 YouTube |
A snake eagle caught a black mamba, which then took over and got hold of the eagle. The eagle was trapped by the mamba and the mamba was stuck in the talons ...

I was perusing HackerNews today. Believe me, it is a good timesink. ⏳

I came across a link to a video titled: Epic Battle Between Lions, Black Mamba and Eagle!. Hoping I wouldn't be rickrolled, I watched the video. It was from Rietspruit Game Reserve, South Africa.

It opens with a rare and intense moment already in progress: a snake eagle caught in the grip of a black mamba. The eagle, clearly in distress, is trapped in the snake’s coils, an unexpected reversal of roles between predator and prey.

As the camera continues rolling, the situation grows even more complex. A pride of lions appears nearby, drawn to the scene. And then things turn interesting.

The entire encounter plays out with minimal interference from the people capturing the scene. And their off-camera commentary adds spice too.

👉 Watch the video here

Yesterday, at the third Tech Writer’s Tribe Chennai conference, I gave a session on a topic I keep returning to: using personal knowledge management (PKM) to make sense of our work lives.

Since the time slot I had was too short for a tool demo (25 mins), I decided to talk about the set of some #pkm practices that were grounded, flexible, and human.

Here’s what I covered:

  • Using a daily note as a home base for thoughts, tasks, and meetings
  • Timeboxing and interstitial journaling to improve focus and reduce context loss
  • Writing structured notes for meetings and people to build continuity over time
  • Treating PKM as a personal practice, not just a productivity method
  • Offering a glimpse into how Obsidian can support these flows

If you're curious, you can view the slides here.

Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning | 🔗 imdb.com |
Our lives are the sum of our choices. Tom Cruise is Ethan Hunt in Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning.

Machine tags 🏷️: movie:imdb=tt9603208, movie:series=Mission Impossible

⭐⭐⭐⭐

This felt like a documentary about the Mission Impossible series. The cuts from previous movies and a half-hearted attempt at tying up plots from the rest of the series was boring.

Tourist Family | 🔗 imdb.com |
A quirky Sri Lankan family seeking a fresh start in India transforms a disconnected neighborhood into a vibrant community with their infectious love and kindness.

Machine tags 🏷️: movie:imdb=tt34915705, movie:language=tamil

⭐⭐⭐⭐

We had been talking about watching this movie in Chennai but never got a chance. Finally got around watching it in Kozhinjampara tonight in a nearly empty theatre.

Raviraj Theatre

Raiders of the Lost Ark | 🔗 imdb.com |
In 1936, archaeologists and adventurers of the U.S. government hired Indiana Jones to find the Ark of the Covenant before the Nazis could obtain its extraordinary powers.

Machine tags 🏷️: movie:imdb=tt0082971, movies:series=Indiana Jones

⭐⭐⭐⭐

Max wanted to watch a movie now that we have a new AC.

I wanted to introduce some old classics.

Max's review: the climax was a bit gross (the melting faces)